top of page

mastering emotionally charged debates

Jun 18, 2024
1 min read

No matter how intensely people disagree, there is a basic premise upon which both sides agree.


Even on polarizing topics like gun control, the extremes on each side both want to live in a world where peaceful, honest, innocent people are protected from bad people with guns. The "how" is the debate. It's what's difficult, nuanced, emotionally charged, and can quickly lead to non-constructive personal attacks.


One way to make progress in disagreements is to keep the "golden premise" (the thing you all agree on) center stage. Continuing to reference what you DO agree on reminds both sides that they share a common interest.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Not Just Semantics

Where I would have written off as semantics when I was younger, I now respect the power of using words intentionally. Shane Parrish taught me to "Never be worried. Be concerned." When you're concerned

 
 
 
Sometimes What Seems Kind Isn't

I once stayed in a relationship I knew wasn’t right. She’d done nothing wrong. It simply wasn't a good fit. I just didn’t want to hurt her. Then a friend pointed out that I was staying out of obligati

 
 
 
No True Solutions

There aren’t really any true solutions. Only trade-offs. Want more freedom? You may have to give up some certainty. Want to get better at something? You will have to be bad at it first. Want a deeper

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page